Immigrants from Uruguay vs Scandinavian Disability Age Over 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,242,093 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626 and weighted average of 46.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,447,012 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 0.39%.

Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Uruguay	Scandinavian
Minimum	26.7%	14.3%
Maximum	88.0%	100.0%
Range	61.3%	85.7%
Mean	49.2%	54.2%
Median	45.9%	47.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	40.9%	43.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	50.6%	62.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.7%	18.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.1%	21.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.6%	21.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Scandinavians by Disability Age Over 75

In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Brazilian (46.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (46.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (46.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cameroon (46.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (46.5%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Nepal (46.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Albania (46.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Canadian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Czechoslovakian (46.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Colombia (46.7%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age Over 75
Israelis	97.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	96.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	96.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	96.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 46.4%
Brazilians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 46.5%
Chileans	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Chile	96.4 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	96.1 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 46.5%
Irish	96.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 46.5%
Dutch	95.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 46.5%
British	95.7 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 46.5%
Indians (Asian)	95.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 46.5%
Hungarians	95.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 46.5%
Czechoslovakians	94.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 46.6%
Canadians	94.4 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 46.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	94.1 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 46.6%
Scandinavians	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 46.6%
Immigrants \| Albania	93.2 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 46.6%
Immigrants \| Colombia	92.6 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 46.7%
Immigrants \| South America	91.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 46.7%