Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Alaskan Athabascan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Alaskan Athabascans
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,480,076 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 114.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.64% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 6.8% | 25.0% |
Range | 6.1% | 22.1% |
Mean | 2.5% | 9.0% |
Median | 2.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Ecuador (2.5%, a difference of 0.55%), Ecuadorian (2.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Guyana | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Yup'ik (5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |