Immigrants from Peru vs South American Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
South American
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
South Americans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs South American Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,787,058 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,776,851 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 0.77%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | South American |
Minimum | 0.24% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 13.2% | 6.4% |
Range | 13.0% | 6.0% |
Mean | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 0.71% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 0.75% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 0.75% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru and South Americans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Immigrants from Eritrea (2.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Jamaican (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |