Immigrants from Peru vs Central American Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
Central American
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
Central Americans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs Central American Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,787,058 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,204,845 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | Central American |
Minimum | 0.24% | 0.55% |
Maximum | 13.2% | 6.2% |
Range | 13.0% | 5.7% |
Mean | 2.7% | 2.3% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 0.91% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 0.91% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru and Central Americans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Immigrants from Eritrea (2.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Afghan (2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Argentinean (2.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Korea (2.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Nicaraguan (2.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Argentineans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.7% |