Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Alaska Native Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Alaska Native
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Alaska Natives
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
29.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Alaska Native Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,322,252 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,753,099 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.81%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Alaska Native |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 22.6% | 15.1% |
Range | 20.9% | 13.8% |
Mean | 6.8% | 6.5% |
Median | 6.0% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua and Alaska Natives by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |