Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Canadian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Canadian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Canadians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
33.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
185th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
25.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Canadian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,642,272 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,069,200 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.697 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.57%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Canadian |
Minimum | 0.56% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 10.3% | 23.1% |
Range | 9.7% | 22.0% |
Mean | 2.4% | 4.7% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.66% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Canadians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Native Hawaiian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Guyanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are European (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), British (2.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Barbados (2.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |