Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Turkish Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Turkish
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Turks
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Turkish Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,892,306 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,748,480 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 5.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Turkish |
Minimum | 0.24% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 4.0% | 7.5% |
Range | 3.7% | 6.8% |
Mean | 1.7% | 2.2% |
Median | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.8% | 2.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.48% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.48% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Turks by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Singapore (1.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Iranian (1.8%, a difference of 0.93%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (1.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Israel (1.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Iran (1.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Pakistan (1.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Asian (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Asia (1.9%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and Bulgarian (1.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |