Immigrants from Germany vs French Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Germany
French
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Germany
French
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
17.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
9.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Germany vs French Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,338,664 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 570,049,309 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of French and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 0.80%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Germany | French |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.65% |
| Maximum | 34.5% | 21.5% |
| Range | 32.9% | 20.9% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 3.8% |
| Median | 3.6% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Germany and French by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are Immigrants from Southern Europe (2.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Korean (2.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Crow (2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants (2.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ukrainian (2.5%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French are Alaskan Athabascan (2.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Central American (2.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Sioux | 24.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.5% |
| Moroccans | 22.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.5% |
| Soviet Union | 22.2 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.5% |
| Ukrainians | 21.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 17.9 /100 | #194 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 15.6 /100 | #195 | Poor 2.5% |
| Koreans | 15.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 2.5% |
| Crow | 15.2 /100 | #197 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 15.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 14.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 13.3 /100 | #200 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
| Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
| French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |