Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Uruguayan Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Uruguayan
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Uruguayans
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE DISABILITY
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Uruguayan Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,455,879 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,784,300 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Uruguayan |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 5.8% |
| Maximum | 55.9% | 28.2% |
| Range | 54.9% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 12.7% |
| Median | 11.9% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Uruguayans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Nigeria (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Syria (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Belgium (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Uruguayans | 95.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 95.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 95.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |