Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Palestinian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Palestinian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Palestinians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Palestinian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,259,714 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,454,064 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Palestinian |
Minimum | 0.86% | 0.070% |
Maximum | 6.8% | 6.8% |
Range | 6.0% | 6.7% |
Mean | 3.2% | 3.0% |
Median | 2.8% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.93% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Palestinians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |