Immigrants from Belgium vs Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Immigrants from Laos
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Immigrants from Laos
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,707,151 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,465,206 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 11.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Immigrants from Laos |
Minimum | 0.96% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 40.5% | 13.9% |
Range | 39.5% | 12.5% |
Mean | 8.1% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.9% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |