Immigrants from Australia vs Zimbabwean Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Zimbabwean
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Zimbabweans
10.4%
MALE DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Zimbabwean Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,204,405 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,379 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 44.7% | 28.1% |
| Range | 42.7% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 11.3% |
| Median | 10.9% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Zimbabweans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Colombia (10.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ecuador (10.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Laotian (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Sierra Leonean (10.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (10.5%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |