Immigrants from Australia vs Costa Rican Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Costa Rican
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Costa Ricans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Costa Rican Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,538,538 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.45%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.86% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 9.0% |
| Range | 21.0% | 8.2% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 3.3% |
| Median | 3.6% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Costa Ricans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |