German Russian vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
German Russian
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
German Russians
Chickasaw
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
9.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German Russian vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,455,793 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 27.5%.
![German Russian vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/german-russians-vs-chickasaw-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | German Russian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 18.8% | 29.7% |
Range | 16.5% | 28.2% |
Mean | 7.4% | 12.1% |
Median | 6.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to German Russians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to German Russians are Immigrants from Albania (6.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (6.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |