French American Indian vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
French American Indian
Subsaharan African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
French American Indians
Sub-Saharan Africans
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,970,739 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,846,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 8.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 27.3% |
Range | 12.8% | 25.7% |
Mean | 7.7% | 8.3% |
Median | 7.8% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 8.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (6.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Germany (6.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |