Cuban vs Celtic Vision Disability
COMPARE
Cuban
Celtic
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Cubans
Celtics
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Celtic Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,885,451 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,807,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.010%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.77% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 5.0% | 12.3% |
Range | 4.2% | 11.9% |
Mean | 2.4% | 3.6% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 4.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.80% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.79% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Celtics by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |