Costa Rican vs Uruguayan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Uruguayan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Costa Ricans
Uruguayans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
40.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
42.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Uruguayan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,497,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,772,408 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.13%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 0.38% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 8.8% | 6.1% |
Range | 8.4% | 5.3% |
Mean | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 0.93% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Uruguayans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |