Costa Rican vs South American Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Costa Rican
South American Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Costa Ricans
South American Indians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
40.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs South American Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,497,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,973 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.38% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 8.8% | 7.1% |
Range | 8.4% | 6.4% |
Mean | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and South American Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |