Costa Rican vs Celtic Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Celtic
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Costa Ricans
Celtics
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
71.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Celtic Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,538,538 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,857,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 27.0%.
![Costa Rican vs Celtic Hearing Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/hearing-disability/costa-ricans-vs-celtics-hearing-disability-chart.webp)
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.86% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 9.0% | 17.2% |
Range | 8.2% | 16.4% |
Mean | 3.3% | 5.6% |
Median | 2.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Pima (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), German (3.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Scottish (3.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Pennsylvania German (3.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% |
English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% |