Chinese vs Fijian Male Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Fijian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Chinese
Fijians
12.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Fijian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,721 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,947,896 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 4.1%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Fijian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 9.2% |
| Maximum | 31.9% | 22.0% |
| Range | 30.7% | 12.7% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 14.2% |
| Median | 12.4% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Fijians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Swiss (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), European (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Basque (12.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Belgian (12.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Swedish (12.1%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Hopi (12.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.68%), Hmong (12.5%, a difference of 0.75%), Scandinavian (12.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and Spaniard (12.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Chinese | 0.4 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Europeans | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Basques | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Belgians | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Swedes | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Canadians | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Scandinavians | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 12.6% |