Central American vs Arab Disability
COMPARE
Central American
Arab
Disability
Disability Comparison
Central Americans
Arabs
11.4%
DISABILITY
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Arab Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,498,688 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.490 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,795,543 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.65%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Arab |
Minimum | 1.6% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 68.2% |
Range | 14.6% | 65.2% |
Mean | 9.9% | 12.9% |
Median | 10.3% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 13.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Arabs by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Korean (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Luxembourger (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Africa (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Croatia (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Luxembourgers | 93.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |
Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 88.3 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.4% |
Ugandans | 87.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 87.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.4% |