Bhutanese vs Scotch-Irish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Scotch-Irish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Scotch-Irish
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Scotch-Irish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,439,452 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 19.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 14.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 13.8% | 49.4% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 12.4% |
| Median | 5.7% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Dominica (6.9%, a difference of 0.030%), West Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (6.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |