Australian vs Shoshone Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Australian
Shoshone
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Australians
Shoshone
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Shoshone Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,618,747 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 23.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Shoshone |
Minimum | 2.5% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 25.0% |
Range | 13.3% | 21.6% |
Mean | 6.9% | 9.7% |
Median | 6.1% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Delaware (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Central American Indian (7.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |