Australian vs Hispanic or Latino Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Australian
Hispanic or Latino
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Australians
Hispanics or Latinos
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Hispanic or Latino Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,103,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 570,237,836 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.399 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Hispanic or Latino |
Minimum | 0.57% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 4.8% |
Range | 21.4% | 3.2% |
Mean | 4.6% | 3.1% |
Median | 3.7% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 0.57% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 0.46% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 0.46% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Hispanics or Latinos by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hispanics or Latinos are Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |