Australian vs Central American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Australian
Central American Indian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Australians
Central American Indians
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Central American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,103,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,009 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 2.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Central American Indian |
Minimum | 0.57% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 15.5% |
Range | 21.4% | 14.6% |
Mean | 4.6% | 4.7% |
Median | 3.7% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Central American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Luxembourger (3.2%, a difference of 0.49%), Greek (3.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |