Greek vs Immigrants from the Azores No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Greek
Immigrants from the Azores
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Greeks
Immigrants from the Azores
9.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
92.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Immigrants from the Azores No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 480,584,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,204,339 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Immigrants from the Azores |
| Minimum | 1.00% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 20.3% | 23.2% |
| Range | 19.3% | 22.1% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 8.3% |
| Median | 5.7% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Immigrants from the Azores by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Puget Sound Salish (9.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Costa Rican (9.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Chippewa (9.4%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Serbians | 94.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |