Cajun vs Bhutanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Cajun
Bhutanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Cajuns
Bhutanese
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Bhutanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,490,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,743,315 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 3.4%.
![Cajun vs Bhutanese No Vehicles in Household](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/no-vehicle-available/cajuns-vs-bhutanese-no-vehicle-available-chart.webp)
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cajun | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.38% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 21.2% | 49.5% |
Range | 20.8% | 48.0% |
Mean | 7.7% | 7.5% |
Median | 7.3% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Bhutanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Lithuanian (8.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (8.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |