Yakama vs Arapaho Unemployment
COMPARE
Yakama
Arapaho
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Yakama
Arapaho
7.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Arapaho Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,909,925 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,773,692 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 34.0%.

Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Arapaho |
| Minimum | 0.90% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 23.9% | 32.1% |
| Range | 23.0% | 27.4% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 12.4% |
| Median | 7.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Arapaho by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Dominican (7.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Sioux (7.4%, a difference of 0.76%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.4%, a difference of 0.82%), Alaska Native (7.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Apache (7.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Inupiat (10.1%, a difference of 2.9%), Yuman (9.1%, a difference of 8.4%), Hopi (8.9%, a difference of 10.2%), Tohono O'odham (8.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and Crow (11.1%, a difference of 12.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 9.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.6% |