Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,575,119 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,707,279 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 2.6%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Uruguayan	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Minimum	3.6%	1.1%
Maximum	19.4%	61.4%
Range	15.8%	60.3%
Mean	8.8%	10.9%
Median	7.9%	8.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.9%	5.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.4%	13.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.5%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.8%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.6%	11.0%

Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Morocco (7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Indonesian (7.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Iranian (7.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Ottawa (7.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (7.9%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Pueblo (7.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Denmark (7.8%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Spain (7.8%, a difference of 0.57%), British West Indian (7.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.64%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 7.8%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%
Moroccans	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 7.8%
Bahamians	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Egypt	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 7.9%
Filipinos	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 7.9%
Ottawa	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 7.9%
Iranians	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 7.9%
Indonesians	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 7.9%
Uruguayans	99.9 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 7.9%