Sudanese vs Thai Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Sudanese
Thai
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Sudanese
Thais
4.8%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Thai Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,979,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,800,802 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Thais and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Thai |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 12.5% | 9.1% |
| Range | 11.5% | 8.1% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| Median | 4.2% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Thais by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Slovak (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Lithuanian (4.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Cypriot (4.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Czechoslovakian (4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and Zimbabwean (4.8%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Australian (4.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Okinawan (4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Austrian (4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Greek (4.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Italians | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Okinawans | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |