Ottawa vs Tsimshian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Ottawa
Tsimshian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Ottawa
Tsimshian
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
11.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Tsimshian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,812,692 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,620,666 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ottawa | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 13.3% |
| Range | 18.7% | 10.9% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 7.1% |
| Median | 5.2% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ottawa and Tsimshian by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Choctaw (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Seminole (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Alsatian (5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Spaniard (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Colombians | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
| Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
| Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
| Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
| Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
| Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
| Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |