Mongolian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
COMPARE
Mongolian
Chickasaw
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Mongolians
Chickasaw
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Chickasaw Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,354,726 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 15.6% | 17.6% |
| Range | 15.1% | 17.1% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 5.6% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Chickasaw by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from England (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and American (5.0%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and American (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 96.3 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Ukrainians | 96.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |