Lebanese vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Lebanese
Chickasaw
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Comparison
Lebanese
Chickasaw
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,576,671 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,802,460 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 6.2%.
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lebanese | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 35.9% | 28.2% |
Range | 33.0% | 27.4% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.9% |
Median | 4.6% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Lebanese and Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Norwegian (4.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Czech (4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Eritrea (4.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and Creek (4.6%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Sudanese (4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Congo (4.5%, a difference of 2.0%), Tsimshian (4.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and Indonesian (4.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Creek | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lebanese | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.7% |