Kenyan vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,662,123 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,251,383 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.322 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.57%.

Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Kenyan	Immigrants from Lithuania
Minimum	1.9%	2.0%
Maximum	26.0%	21.2%
Range	24.1%	19.1%
Mean	11.5%	10.7%
Median	11.5%	10.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.2%	6.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.5%	13.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.2%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.2%	4.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.1%	4.7%

Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Immigrants from Lithuania by Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

In terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Austrian (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Japan (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Taiwan (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Chilean (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (11.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Thailand (11.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (11.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years
Kenyans	95.7 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 11.2%
Austrians	95.5 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	95.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	95.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	95.1 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Latvia	95.1 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| North America	95.1 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 11.2%
Lithuanians	94.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 11.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	94.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	94.4 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 11.3%
Nicaraguans	94.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 11.3%
Estonians	94.2 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 11.3%
Celtics	94.0 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 11.3%
Pakistanis	94.0 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 11.3%
Iroquois	93.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	93.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	93.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	93.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	93.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 11.3%
Chileans	93.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	92.9 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 11.3%