Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Chickasaw
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Chickasaw
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
76.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,822,347 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,341,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.5% | 0.90% |
Maximum | 10.0% | 13.2% |
Range | 7.5% | 12.3% |
Mean | 5.3% | 6.3% |
Median | 5.0% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Chickasaw by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Slovak (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Macedonian (5.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Colombian (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Pakistani (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Lebanese (5.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.2% |
Chickasaw | 82.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.2% |
Colombians | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.2% |
Pakistanis | 80.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 80.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.2% |
Lebanese | 79.9 /100 | #136 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 79.8 /100 | #137 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 79.7 /100 | #138 | Good 5.2% |
Kenyans | 79.4 /100 | #139 | Good 5.2% |
Brazilians | 79.3 /100 | #140 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #141 | Good 5.2% |
Fijians | 78.3 /100 | #142 | Good 5.2% |
Syrians | 78.0 /100 | #143 | Good 5.2% |
Sri Lankans | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 5.2% |
Macedonians | 77.7 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 77.6 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 77.5 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 76.2 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 76.0 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Slovaks | 75.5 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |