Immigrants from Pakistan vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,232,372 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and unemployment rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 356,241,688 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.736 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 1.5%.

Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Pakistan	Czechoslovakian
Minimum	0.80%	2.9%
Maximum	17.4%	63.2%
Range	16.6%	60.3%
Mean	4.3%	11.5%
Median	4.2%	8.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.9%	4.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	4.9%	11.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.0%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.4%	12.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.4%	11.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan and Czechoslovakians by Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Korea (4.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Okinawan (4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Jordan (4.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Scotland (4.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (4.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Luxembourger (4.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
Czechoslovakians	99.8 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 4.2%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 4.2%
Zimbabweans	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 4.2%
Immigrants \| Singapore	99.7 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 4.2%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.7 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.2%
Luxembourgers	99.6 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.2%
Filipinos	99.6 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.2%
Finns	99.6 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.2%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.6 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.2%
Basques	99.6 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.2%
Burmese	99.6 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.2%
Poles	99.5 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.2%
Irish	99.5 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.2%
Chickasaw	99.5 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.2%
Latvians	99.4 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.2%
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.3 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.3 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 4.3%
Greeks	99.3 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 4.3%
Okinawans	99.2 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.2 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.2 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 4.3%