Immigrants from China vs Egyptian Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Egyptian
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from China
Egyptians
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Egyptian Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,825,102 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.040%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Egyptian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 8.2% | 39.9% |
| Range | 6.6% | 38.6% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 6.0% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Egyptians by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.4 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 66.7 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 66.6 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
| Laotians | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |
| Spanish | 65.1 /100 | #162 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 64.7 /100 | #163 | Good 5.2% |