Finnish vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 358,091,126 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,105,176 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.91%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Finnish	Immigrants from Lithuania
Minimum	1.1%	0.80%
Maximum	33.3%	50.0%
Range	32.2%	49.2%
Mean	9.0%	6.1%
Median	6.5%	4.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.5%	2.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.8%	5.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.3%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.8%	9.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.7%	9.1%

Demographics Similar to Finns and Immigrants from Lithuania by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Immigrants from Senegal (4.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (4.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Thailand (4.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and Macedonian (4.7%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Africa (4.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Cambodian (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Pima (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), French Canadian (4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Pennsylvania German (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Macedonians	95.7 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.7%
Albanians	95.3 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	95.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.7%
Finns	94.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Senegal	94.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	93.7 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	93.0 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.7%
Austrians	91.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Choctaw	90.3 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	90.2 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Syria	90.1 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	89.6 /100 \| #131	Excellent 4.8%
Lithuanians	89.6 /100 \| #132	Excellent 4.8%
Yaqui	89.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 4.8%
Basques	88.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 4.8%
Pennsylvania Germans	87.8 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.8%
French Canadians	87.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.8%
Cambodians	86.9 /100 \| #137	Excellent 4.8%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	86.7 /100 \| #138	Excellent 4.8%
Immigrants \| Africa	86.6 /100 \| #139	Excellent 4.8%
Pima	85.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 4.8%