Czechoslovakian vs Filipino Unemployment
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Filipino
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Filipinos
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Filipino Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,083,136 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,275,542 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.86%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Filipino |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 40.9% | 8.8% |
| Range | 39.6% | 7.7% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 4.5% |
| Median | 4.9% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Filipinos by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Bolivian (4.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Scotch-Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Lithuanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Northern European (4.8%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Yugoslavian (4.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Austrian (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), French (4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Irish | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |