Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Israel Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 334,834,732 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,300,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 2.5%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bhutanese	Immigrants from Israel
Minimum	0.50%	0.90%
Maximum	55.8%	19.6%
Range	55.3%	18.7%
Mean	10.1%	6.9%
Median	6.4%	6.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.4%	5.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.3%	7.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.9%	2.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.0%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.0%	3.8%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Israel by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Cuba (6.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Indonesia (6.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Asian (6.7%, a difference of 0.54%), Iranian (6.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Australia (6.8%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Japan (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (6.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Soviet Union (6.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Sweden (6.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Belarus (6.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 6.5%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Belarus	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Moldova	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 6.6%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 6.6%
Yakama	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 6.6%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 6.6%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 6.6%
Hmong	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Russia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 6.7%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Cuba	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 6.7%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 6.7%
Iranians	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.9 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 6.8%