Zimbabwean vs Jamaican Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Jamaican
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Zimbabweans
Jamaicans
20.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
21.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Jamaican Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,868,173 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 360,459,370 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 4.8%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Jamaican |
Minimum | 0.87% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 43.9% | 44.3% |
Range | 43.0% | 42.8% |
Mean | 17.3% | 17.2% |
Median | 18.1% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 21.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Spain (20.4%, a difference of 0.020%), German (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), European (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Czech (20.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Latvia (20.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 20.3% |
Moroccans | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 24.4 /100 | #192 | Fair 20.4% |
Nigerians | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 20.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 23.0 /100 | #195 | Fair 20.4% |
Czechs | 22.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 20.4% |
Zimbabweans | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 20.7 /100 | #198 | Fair 20.4% |
Germans | 20.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 20.4% |
Europeans | 19.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 20.4% |
Mexicans | 18.3 /100 | #201 | Poor 20.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 17.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 20.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 20.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 17.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 20.5% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Turkish (19.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Soviet Union (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Russian (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Panama | 94.0 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.7 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Cape Verdeans | 93.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Slovaks | 92.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | England | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Canada | 92.9 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Latvians | 92.7 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Jamaicans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Turks | 92.1 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 92.1 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Soviet Union | 92.0 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Russians | 91.5 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Austrians | 90.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 19.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 88.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 19.6% |