Zimbabwean vs Belgian Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Belgian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Belgians
11.3%
POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Belgian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,186,100 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,864,059 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Belgian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 19.3% | 23.4% |
| Range | 17.3% | 21.2% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 9.4% |
| Median | 8.4% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Belgians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), European (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Czechoslovakian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and English (11.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Serbians | 97.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.3 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Europeans | 97.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Dutch | 96.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Cambodians | 96.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 96.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |