Yup'ik vs Sioux Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Sioux
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yup'ik
Sioux
26.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
31.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Sioux Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,804,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 26.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,047,098 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 31.3%, a difference of 17.5%.
![Yup'ik vs Sioux Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/yupik-vs-sioux-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik | Sioux |
Minimum | 2.9% | 7.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 97.1% | 92.9% |
Mean | 36.3% | 49.1% |
Median | 30.7% | 43.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.3% | 29.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.3% | 64.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.0% | 35.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.0% | 24.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 24.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Sioux by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Creek (27.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 2.0%), Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 2.8%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 7.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |