Yuman vs Immigrants from Brazil Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Yuman
Immigrants from Brazil
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Yuman
Immigrants from Brazil
28.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Immigrants from Brazil Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,623,362 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 28.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,154,943 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 92.0%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman | Immigrants from Brazil |
Minimum | 5.3% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.8% |
Range | 94.7% | 47.4% |
Mean | 40.6% | 15.6% |
Median | 33.4% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.7% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 38.2% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.4% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.7% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Pima (29.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.46%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.4%), Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 7.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |