Yugoslavian vs Subsaharan African Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Subsaharan African
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Sub-Saharan Africans
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Subsaharan African Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,378,936 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.706 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 22.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 26.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.6% | 99.2% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 20.0% |
| Median | 8.9% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 19.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 17.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 17.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Iroquois (13.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |