Vietnamese vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Vietnamese
Cherokee
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Vietnamese
Cherokee
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Vietnamese vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,480,173 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,336,049 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 2.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Vietnamese | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.61% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 51.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 51.2% | 94.7% |
Mean | 20.1% | 30.7% |
Median | 17.1% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 34.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Vietnamese and Cherokee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.64%), Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |