Ute vs Tohono O'odham Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Tohono O'odham
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Ute
Tohono O'odham
16.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Tohono O'odham Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,650,694 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,718,302 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 22.9%, a difference of 40.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 3.5% | 13.4% |
Maximum | 59.1% | 93.1% |
Range | 55.6% | 79.8% |
Mean | 23.3% | 39.1% |
Median | 17.9% | 39.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 21.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.9% | 51.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.0% | 29.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 20.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Tohono O'odham by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Dominican (16.1%, a difference of 0.99%), Black/African American (15.8%, a difference of 2.7%), Houma (16.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and Native/Alaskan (16.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Navajo (22.3%, a difference of 2.6%), Puerto Rican (22.0%, a difference of 3.9%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 10.0%), Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and Pima (20.4%, a difference of 12.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |