Ute vs Ecuadorian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Ecuadorian
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Ute
Ecuadorians
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
5.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Ecuadorian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,777,043 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 24.5%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 6.5% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 70.6% | 38.0% |
Range | 64.1% | 35.1% |
Mean | 32.1% | 15.1% |
Median | 23.3% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.2% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Thailand (14.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Spanish American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (14.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Ghanaian (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Sudanese (14.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Guyana | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.3% |
Puget Sound Salish | 6.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.3% |
French | 6.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 6.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.3% |
French Canadians | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ecuadorians | 5.2 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ghanaians | 4.8 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.4% |
Sudanese | 4.4 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.4% |
Nigerians | 4.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 4.0 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.5% |
Nicaraguans | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.5% |