Ukrainian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Slavic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ukrainians
Slavs
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ukrainian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,732,130 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 7.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ukrainian | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 61.9% | 80.7% |
Range | 60.6% | 80.2% |
Mean | 19.1% | 23.6% |
Median | 15.9% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 28.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 15.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ukrainians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Argentinean (14.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Tlingit-Haida (14.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |