Turkish vs Swiss Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Swiss
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Turks
Swiss
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
POVERTY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Swiss Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,706,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,705,995 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 2.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Swiss |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 36.2% |
| Range | 18.0% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 10.3% |
| Median | 8.7% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Swiss by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Asian (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Austrian (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Ukrainian (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Italy (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (11.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Germans | 98.1 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ukrainians | 97.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.2% |